Tuesday, 3 March 2015
Once a month cyclists, skateboarders and scooter users come together for Critical Mass, a protest group aiming to reclaim the streets of London for self-propelled transport. The Mass has no set route and no set leader, it simply follows the route of whoever happens to be at the front at that time. Equipped with speaker systems and alcohol, the 2,000 strong band revel in disrupting traffic and attracting the ire of taxi drivers. As it snakes through the city, the mass is cheered and derided in equal measure.
Friday, 20 February 2015
Pietermaritzberg is the track that Internet Warriors and perennial World Cup under-achievers seem to loath and dread in equal measure. They fear its dry, dusty, physicality; they run scared from the notorious motorway section and scoff at the technicality of the increasingly difficult top section.
Firstly, I think it’s great that a track can generate so much discussion, it speaks volumes of a community that clearly love their sport enough to produce the passionate tirades that are ubiquitous across forums and message boards.
Unfortunately however, I think most of what is said is unfounded and wrong.
As much of a pity as it is, most of us will never be able to visit every World Cup race in a year, the viewing figures on the internet are massive compared to actual live audiences. The tracks that many people are imagining - rugged hillsides, dense forests and massively steep chutes, simply aren’t suitable for filming on.
The two best races of recent years were the World Champs of 2011 and Andorra 2013, but the reason they were so good was because a relative unknown pulled out an unbelievable run to take the win. The actual race footage itself (minus Rob Warner’s commentary) was quite average, the crews couldn’t even access the gnarliest bits of the track.
At Pietermaritzberg you get an uninterrupted minute of footage of the bottom section of the track, watching the riders style it over the final hip is genuinely great, the same is true of the cable cam shots at Hafjell.
Frankly, I would take a better viewing experience of the race live for a majority of the audience at the expense of ‘pure’ downhill, than risk losing the coverage altogether.
If the coverage of our sport starts to dip so will the sponsors interest which in turn will lead to a slowing of product development. If I’m honest I don’t really want every Tom, Dick and Harry joining me at my local trails, but I do want the sport to remain popular enough for me to drool over new kit every year.
We also need to think about the tracks themselves. I agree, there’s nothing better than watching a top rider smash into a loamy berm, spraying roost wildly before sprinting away, but this simply isn’t sustainable. Loose, dusty, rutted trails simply can’t stand the abuse of thousands of runs from the world’s top riders, these guys ride hard!
When a track is changing so much that it makes practice irrelevant and your results depends massively on where you qualify, it becomes a pointless exercise. You can’t know who the best in the world is unless they all ride on a track that’s comparable, with a reliable surface. As odd as it sounds, a bit of consistency is no bad thing, at least it gives our sport credibility rather than being an expensive game of Russian roulette on an uneven playing field.
But what says most about the suitability of Pietermaritzberg is not looking at who shouts the loudest, but who says nothing at all. Both the Athertons, Minaar, Gwin and Smith, the sport’s consummate professionals and champions all keep quiet on the subject, they get their heads down, they train and they consistently win.
Like it or not, bike park style tracks are becoming part of mountain biking, and frankly we encourage them by watching and sharing endless Whistler edits. The complete modern day mountain biker can compete as strongly and consistently on these tracks as they can on Val di Sole or Andorra, and that is the bottom line.